New York
347 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1402New York, NY 10016
USA
Home / Insights / Descriptive, generic, distinctive: why the word you love may be refused
The most common surprise in trademark registration is that the problem is not someone else's mark but the name itself. How the categories work and what to do about them.
You have a name. It fits the business, you may already own the domain, and someone has drawn a logo. Then you try to register it and the office says the name cannot be protected.
This is one of the most common surprises in trademark work, and it often has nothing to do with another owner. The problem is the name. A trademark has one job: to show where goods or services come from. A name that only describes what you sell does that job badly, so offices refuse it or give it very little protection.
It helps to picture a line running from the weakest names to the strongest.
Generic, descriptive, suggestive, arbitrary, fanciful.
The further to the right, the more distinctive the name and the easier it is to register. Two names for the same coffee shop show the difference. "Coffee" tells the customer what you sell and nothing about who you are, so it cannot tell you apart from any other coffee business. "Lumora" says nothing about coffee. If it is free and meets the other requirements, it has a good chance.
One caution: the labels and the tests behind them differ between countries. Treat them as a way of thinking, not as a formula that predicts what a particular office will do.
A generic term is what the product is called. "Shoes" for shoes, "coffee" for coffee. If one seller could own it, nobody else could describe their own product. Offices do not allow that.
A quick test: take your brand away from the word. Is what is left simply what customers call the product? Then it is generic.
A descriptive mark names a feature, quality, purpose, ingredient or origin. "Fast Delivery", "Premium Coffee", "Digital Accounting", "Healthy Snacks". Customers understand them at once, which is why they are tempting.
For an examiner the same clarity is a warning. If you receive exclusive rights to those words, what happens to competitors who need them to describe their own services? That is the reason many descriptive names are refused.
A suggestive mark points to something without saying it outright. A software company calling itself CLOUDKEEP hints at storage in the cloud, but the customer has to make a small leap. That leap is what makes the name more distinctive than "Cloud Storage". The line between suggestive and descriptive is not always sharp, and examiners can disagree, which is one more reason to search and assess before you file.
An arbitrary mark is a real word with no link to the goods: Apple for computers. A fanciful mark is a word made up for the purpose, such as Kodak. These are usually the easiest to protect. The trade-off is marketing. A made-up word means nothing until you give it meaning, and that takes effort.
A word is judged against the goods it is used for. "Orange" for fruit is descriptive. "Orange" for telecommunications has nothing to do with the service and has worked as a brand. So a name you see used successfully somewhere says little about whether you can register it for your own goods. The class you file in changes the analysis, and the class finder can help you pick the right one.
Sometimes. In some countries a descriptive term can become protectable once customers have come to see it as pointing to one business. This is called acquired distinctiveness, and the requirements vary. It usually needs proof of long and substantial use. For a new business, choosing a distinctive name from the start is much simpler than trying to turn a weak one into a strong one later.
Descriptiveness and genericness are two of several grounds. An office can also refuse a mark that is misleading, that is too close to an earlier mark, or that does not work as a trademark under the local law. The grounds differ by country, so a word that is registered elsewhere is no guarantee for you. The page on why offices refuse gives the overview, and the glossary explains the terms.
Here is a simple way to narrow a list:
The question changes from "can I make this one name work?" to "which of these names is best for the business and can also be protected?"
A short example. A skincare company considers PURE SKIN, SKINOVA and MOONLIGHT. The first describes the product and its positioning. The second is invented and more distinctive, though it still needs a careful search. The third is an ordinary word with no link to skincare. They raise three different trademark questions, and none of them is answered by which one sounds best.
A generic term is the name of the product itself. A descriptive term describes a feature or quality of it. "Coffee" for coffee is generic. "Hot coffee" is descriptive. Both cause problems, but a descriptive term can sometimes become protectable through use, while a generic term faces a more basic obstacle.
No. A name can be unique and still be too close to an existing mark, or unsuitable for the goods, or a problem in a particular country.
Sometimes, if their goods are far apart and the other circumstances allow it. What matters is whether the use of both could mislead customers.
Yes. Changing a name before launch is a small job. After the packaging, the advertising and the first customers, it is not.
Run your shortlist through the name check, then request a search for the names you like best. If you decide to go ahead, we can file the application.
This article is general information and is not legal advice. Rules differ between countries and change over time; check the official source for your case.
If you could not find what you were looking for, write to us. A trademark specialist will answer you personally.
We reply by email. [email protected]
Get expert advice